SB 95 – Emergency Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Law

On March 19, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 95, which creates new Labor Code section 248.2 and mandates that employers provide employees with supplemental paid sick leave (SPSL) for various COVID-related absences in addition to paid time off benefits employees receive by law or policy, e.g., non-COVID statutory paid sick leave or vacation. Additionally, SB 95 creates new Labor Code section 248.3, which mandates that providers of in-home supportive and/or waiver personal care services receive SPSL.

The new statutes will apply retroactively to January 1, 2021, and are effective through September 30, 2021, though technically they do not begin until March 29, 2021 – 10 days after the governor signed SB 95.

 

FAQs:

What employers are covered?

The new law applies to employers in the state of California with 25 or more employees.

 

Which employees are eligible?

Employees who are not able to work or telework for any of the reasons detailed below, qualify for the paid leave. There is no length of service requirement for the use of the COVID-19 SPSL under SB 95.

 

When can employees take leave?

Employees are entitled to leave for the following reasons:

  • The employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation period related to COVID-19;
  • The employee has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19;
  • The employee is attending an appointment to receive a vaccine for protection against COVID-19;
  • The employee is experiencing symptoms related to a COVID-19 vaccine that prevents the employee from being able to work or telework;
  • The employee is experiencing symptoms related to COVID-19 and seeking medical diagnosis;
  • The employee is caring for a family member who is subject to a quarantine or isolation order or has been advised to self-quarantine;
  • The employee is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed or otherwise unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19 on the premises.

 

How much leave are employees entitled to?

Generally, full time employees are entitled to 80 hours of COVID-19 SPSL, while part-time employees are entitled to an amount of COVID-19 SPSL correlating with the number of hours the employee regularly works over 2 weeks.

 

Is there a monetary cap on the COVID-19 SPSL?

The leave must be paid at the employee’s regular rate of pay and is capped at $511 per day and $5,110 in aggregate.

 

Is the new COVID-19 SPSL in addition to the many COVID-19 related leave provided for in 2020?

Yes, this new bucket of 80 hours of leave is in addition to any leave an employee took in 2020 under the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act or AB 1867.

 

How is the retroactive provision of the COVID-19 SPSL applied?

Employers must provide retroactive payment for qualifying leave taken since January 1, 2021, once the employee makes an oral or written request for such payment. Employers must make this payment on or before the payday for the next full pay period after the employee makes the oral or written request. The employee’s wage statement must separately list the payment and reflect the hours available, rate of pay, and corresponding COVID-19 SPSL wages.

 

Can employers credit any COVID-19 related paid leave provided since January 1, 2021?

Employers who provided supplemental paid sick leave on or after January 1, 2021, under any local COVID-19 paid leave ordinance or a COVID-19 specific employer policy, may be able to count such paid leave towards the requirements of the new law. Excluding regular state required paid sick leave, SB 95 authorizes an employer to credit towards COVID-19 SPSL the hours of other paid leave the employer provided to employees on or after January 1, 2021, for absences taken for the same COVID-19–related reasons as those outlined in the bill. Employers may not credit paid leave they provided employees for COVID-19–related reasons in 2020.

 

Is there a prohibition on forcing employees to use other leave first?

An employer may not force covered employees to use any other form of paid or unpaid leave or time off, including company-provided sick leave, vacation, or paid time off (PTO), before using COVID-19 SPSL. Instead, SB 95 authorizes employees to choose the number of COVID-19 SPSL hours to use, and when, up to the number of COVID-19 SPSL hours for which the employees are eligible.

 

Use of COVID-19 SPSL before pay required under the Cal/OSHA emergency temporary standards?

Although generally the employee may select when he or she uses COVID-19 SPSL, the employer can require that an employee exhaust COVID-19 SPSL before the employer pays exclusion pay under the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS). Currently, employers must pay exclusion pay if they exclude an employee who tests positive during the infectious period or an employee has close contact with a positive individual and either situation is work-related.

 

What are the wage statement requirements?

An employer must list the amount of an employee’s available COVID-19 SPSL on the employee’s wage statement as a distinct line item. The employer must list available COVID-19 SPSL separately from any other available paid sick leave or paid time off. The wage statement requirement becomes effective the first full pay period after the statute’s effective date of March 29, 2021.

 

Is there a notice or posting requirement?

Yes, employers must post a notice of the COVID-19 SPSL requirements in a conspicuous place in the workplace. If an employer’s covered employees do not frequent a workplace, the employer may satisfy the notice requirement by disseminating notice through electronic means such as email. SB 95 requires the Labor Commissioner’s office to release a model notice within 7 days of the bill passing into law.

 

This content was provided by SCGMA professional counsel and is for general informational purposes only. Readers should contact their own professional counsel for company specific matters in the relevant jurisdiction.

 

Click here to read more information by Littler Mendelson.

Recent Posts

SCGMA 2024 CA Legislative Scorecard

The last actions of the 2024 California Legislative Session took place on September 30th, which was the deadline for Governor Newsom to sign or veto legislation. SCGMA again had an effective legislative session pursuing industry measures, highlighted by major reforms…

November 1, 2024

SCGMA Webinar: AI Applications in Construction

Join us for an engaging session on the transformative role of AI in the construction industry with Erin Khan, an established AEC technology leader. With over a decade of experience, Erin will share her insights on how AI is reshaping…

October 29, 2024

SCGMA Technical Bulletin – Spandrel and Shadowbox Considerations

The glazing industry has always provided innovations to their glazed facades in order to address the aesthetic considerations of the architectural designers.  Given the preference of coated glass with greater visible light transmissions and less reflectivity, spandrel conditions matching vision…

October 22, 2024

SCGMA YPG Event Recap – 2024 Glazing Boot Camp

On September 25th, we held another successful Glazing Boot Camp at our apprenticeship training facility in Commerce. Participants enjoyed an engaging presentation on layouts, setting the stage for the hands-on learning experience that followed. Attendees worked side by side with…

October 8, 2024

SCGMA YPG All Access Services Equipment Tour

Join us for an insightful tour of All Access Services, a leading provider of rental equipment, tools and machines throughout Southern California with 25 years of experience. Explore their extensive range of specialized glazing equipment, including glass handling tools, cutting…

August 27, 2024
MORE STORIES